> > Yep i agree with what you're saying about the existing tests, and even > with other non-SCA bindings too you shouldn't generally specify an > absolute uri on a service. > > I think there are likely problems with the endpoint information that > goes into the registry for the different bindings, most of my testing > has just been with the hazelcast based sca binding, the others aren't > consistent and use different base addresses that may or may not be > accessible across the domain. > > ...ant > > > ...ant >
Ok, fair enough. It's something we'll need to take a look at. Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
