me too
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Simon Nash <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I'm OK with all of this. I believe the implication (not stated explicitly) >>> is that everything in "modules" needs to be included in the main build. >>> I think this should be a requirement, and anything that isn't ready for this >>> should be under "contrib". >>> >>> Also, I'm not sure how this affects the contents of "samples". I just >>> came across two recently added 1.x samples that aren't in the build, and >>> one of these can't be added to the build because it isn't buildable. >>> I think we should treat "samples" in the same way as "modules", which >>> would suggest the following structure: >>> >>> trunk >>> modules (for release, all in the build) >>> samples (for release, all in the build) >>> etc. >>> contrib (excluded from release profile) >>> modules (not for release, some in the build) >>> samples (not for release, some in the build) >>> etc. >>> >>> Simon >> >> Ok by me to have modules and samples as sub-directories of contrib. >> >> Simon >> > > All seems good to me. > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
