On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: > Binding REST was originally created as a copy of Binding HTTP and it > has been enhanced to a great extent without really removing any of the > native Binding HTTP functionality. > > I was wondering what are people thoughts on deprecating the current > Binding.HTTP, and make the runtime to "proxy" all binding.http to > binding.rest. > > Thoughts ? > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
Hi Luciano Not sure what you mean by deprecating here. Are you suggesting getting rid of binding.http altogether or keeping binding.http but using the rest binding code to implement it? My concern about binding.http is that It's not clear (to me at least) what's going to happen with binding.http at OASIS. There is an old draft spec but I don't seen any discussion about whether this is going to be further developed or whether something else will be created in its place. Assuming that OASIS have a binding.http it would seem sensible for Tuscany to have an implementation. Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
