[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Kurz updated TUSCANY-3625:
--------------------------------
Attachment: 3625.fix.1.patch
Here's a patch which fixes the problem.
I wasn't sure if the Operation here could really be anything other than
JavaOperation, and mentioned this in a comment in my source.
I wasn't able to run a full build with itests however, but thought I'd post
this patch anyway.
> Issue converting case on methodName for WSDL-derived operation used with
> binding.ejb reference
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-3625
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3625
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java SCA Java Implementation Extension
> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.6
> Environment: sca-java-1.x, r959098
> Reporter: Scott Kurz
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: 3625.fix.1.patch, 3625.recreate.patch
>
>
> So the scenario here is I start with a WSDL with upper-case operation name,
> say "Add", and then generate Java from it. Well, JAX-WS says to generate
> with a name starting with lower-case, such as:
> @WebService
> public interface AddServiceRemote {
> @WebMethod(operationName = "Add")
> double add(double n1, double n2);
> Say that someone implements an EJB using this Java interface, and now I'm
> trying to use this same Java interface to build an SCA client of this EJB
> using a reference with binding.ejb.
> The problem I'll run into in the current Tuscany impl (1.x.. haven't looked
> at 2.x) is that our runtime will use the JAXWSJavaInterfaceProcessor to
> calculate the operation name as "Add" (starts with capital 'A'). It will
> pass that name to the binding-ejb-runtime code which will blow up with
> NoSuchMethodException.
> I think the right thing to do here is to "work backwards" from the operation
> name to the real Java method name we want to invoke over. In other words,
> treat this as a bug and fix it.
> Since Java<-> WSDL mapping questions are always interesting, however...
> I'll put this out there for comment.
> Thanks,
> Scott
> -----------
> Not sure how to make a new test so I'll tweak an existing test and attach to
> show a recreate....
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
