On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:11 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:55 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Author: antelder >>> Date: Thu Jul 29 08:55:37 2010 >>> New Revision: 980365 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=980365&view=rev >>> Log: >>> Add an exclude for another test thats started to fail >>> >>> Modified: >>> tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/compliance-tests/java-caa/pom.xml >>> >>> Modified: tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/compliance-tests/java-caa/pom.xml >>> URL: >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/compliance-tests/java-caa/pom.xml?rev=980365&r1=980364&r2=980365&view=diff >>> ============================================================================== >>> --- tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/compliance-tests/java-caa/pom.xml (original) >>> +++ tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/compliance-tests/java-caa/pom.xml Thu Jul 29 >>> 08:55:37 2010 >>> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ >>> <configuration> >>> <excludes> >>> <exclude>**/JCA_11008_TestCase.java</exclude><!-- could be due >>> to out of date compliance artifacts --> >>> + <exclude>**/JCA_10013_TestCase.java</exclude> >>> <exclude>**/JCA_8001_TestCase.java</exclude> >>> <exclude>**/JCA_8006_TestCase.java</exclude> >>> <exclude>**/JCA_8007_TestCase.java</exclude> >>> >>> >>> >> >> Is this a new test or have we broken something? >> > > It was passing yesterday and doesn't today. Fails with "...has no > matching policy set". There's lots of CAA test failing presently so > for now I'm just excluding them and will try to sort them all out one > by once other things have settled down. > > ...ant >
K, np, was just interested to understand how the situation is changing. There seem to be more changes happening in the otests themselves. Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
