sure, I was just giving the background for why we are where we are, I'd be pleased to see the code advanced again
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: > Cannot we start a new branch to make such upgrade? Potentially, we can also > implement the OASIS SDO 3.0 spec in Tuscany. > Thanks, > Raymond > ________________________________________________________________ > Raymond Feng > [email protected] > Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org > Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com > Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com > ________________________________________________________________ > On Aug 6, 2010, at 8:20 AM, kelvin goodson wrote: > > The reason why we are stuck at such a back level of EMF is that SDO > java 2.1 spec requires support for java 1.4, and the EMF version we > rely upon was the last EMF version that didn't use java generics > introduced in java 5. > > Kelvin. > > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Florian Pinel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Some people in my team would like to use the Eclipse OCL parser to evaluate > > expressions on SDO objects, but the OCL parser requires EMF 2.5. We've > > started migrating Tuscany SDO to that version and should be able to pass all > > the JUnit tests soon. Would it be OK to make an SDO release with EMF 2.5? > > -- > > Florian Pinel > > >
