On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Mike Edwards
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Simon Nash wrote:
>>
>> It's been over six months since we released 1.6.  Since then a number
>> of bugs have been found in 1.6 and fixed in the 1.x codebase.
>>
>> Some of these problems (e.g., TUSCANY-3587 and TUSCANY-3588) are
>> quite serious from a user perspective and I'd like to propose that we
>> produce a 1.6.1 bug fix release based on the 1.6 release branch with
>> the existing JIRA fixes merged in.  I'd be willing to volunteer as
>> release manager for this.
>>
>> I searched JIRA for issues with an Affects Versions tag of Java-SCA-1.6
>> and a Fix For tag of Java-SCA-Next, and which are marked as fixed.
>> I found the following:
>> TUSCANY-3639 Wire interceptors not created until binding interceptors have
>> executed in Service wire
>> TUSCANY-3625 Issue converting case on methodName for WSDL-derived
>> operation used with binding.ejb reference
>> TUSCANY-3615 itest/implementation-osgi produces bundle cache errors
>> TUSCANY-3589 Domain manager produces "get - Error getting data" message
>> when doing a search
>> TUSCANY-3588 NullPointerException when adding composite in Domain Manager
>> GUI
>> TUSCANY-3587 Domain manager produces "post - Error getting data" message
>> when adding a composite
>> TUSCANY-3561 Domain manager throws policy exception if definitions.xml
>> file is read after .composite file
>> TUSCANY-3551 ClassCastException in SCA Store Tutorial Integration Test
>> TUSCANY-3540 Axis2SCAReferenceBindingProvider throws exception if servlet
>> host not present
>> TUSCANY-3490 Tuscany SCA binary distribution doesn't include
>> implementation.web support
>>
>> As a starting point I would suggest that these are the only changes
>> that should be included in 1.6.1.  This should allow the release to be
>> done quite quickly and easily as it avoids the possibility of problems
>> caused by adding new functionality.
>>
>> Does anyone know of any JIRAs with bug fixes for 1.6 that don't appear
>> in the above list, or any commits with bug fixes for 1.6 that don't
>> have JIRAs?
>>
>>  Simon
>>
>>
>
> +1 from me - and I don't have any other JIRAs to suggest.
>
>
> Yours,  Mike.
>

+1 from me for doing the release in the way you suggest. I'll have a
look to see if I have JIRA to contribute.

Regards

Simon

-- 
Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com

Reply via email to