On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:43 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> - Check that we can use binding.ws under binding.sca successfully in >> async mode. > > By that are you implying that the only binding.sca we'll have that > works is when using the ws based version of the sca binding? > > ...ant >
No, I'm implying that that's the one I want to fix first because I understand it. The async function is not really binding dependent as it stands, it only requires bindings to pass certain headers in the messages that are sent. Fixing others should not be too onerous. Optimizing this to exploit naturally asynchronous bindings is another question, e.g. JMS should fit pretty well. Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
