Florian MOGA wrote:
Tried the geronimo servlet 3.0 artifact and it works fine. I've
committed the latest pom containing it. It's much better having a stable
artifact.
This seems like the right solution.
Thanks for the tip.
In relation to this topic, I wonder why Sun (Oracle) wouldn't make
public the javaee 6 jars containing the implementation in maven
repositories. The license doesn't prevent them from doing so... From
what I read, the only way to do it is to download the jars or take them
from the glassfish distribution and install them manually in the local
repository...
I can only assume they don't want to make life too easy for people
using non-Sun implementations.
Simon
Florian
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:40 PM, ant elder <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Florian MOGA <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> In conclusion, we've got 3 possibilities:
>
> javaee-web-api + javax.mail
> javaee-web-api + geronimo.javamail
> servlet-api:3.0-alpha-1
>
> Let me know which option seems best for you. I'd go for the
servlet-api due
> to it's conciseness but I don't know how stable it is...
A servlet-api jar sounds the best to me too if one can be found that
works. How about this one:
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec/1.0/
...ant
