On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:31 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'm not sure that i see the value of the feature modules. > ...snip > > I'm not sure I understand this uncertainty. Is it that you don't see > the value of > > 1/ grouping modules in order to generate modules subsets, manifest > jars, shaded jars > > or > > 2/ the specific groups that currently exist in features and shades > > or > > 3/ something else > > Note I'm assuming > > A/ that grouping modules using some mechanism is useful > B/ that the technical differences between features and shades is > unimportant in the context of this question. > C/ that the outcome of this discussion will be one way of grouping > modules regardless of what those groups might be. > > Simon > > --
Simon and i chatted about this a bit, i'm still not really convinced about what the features give us and would still be interested in answers to the questions in the previous email about the ws and ejava features. I have made a new "base" feature from the shaded base jar and changed the shaded base to use that feature, is anyone more happy with it like that? ...ant
