Hi, I've only just got back to this and I'm not sure how to come to closure . Is it reasonable to adopt the "publish a top level sample pom as the parent of all samples" approach at this point, or do we need to be more circumspect? I could take a look at more projects, but I don't have a good idea who might have a good story to tell. I could ask on the maven users' list, or I could just go ahead and change all the sample poms to reference this one parent. thoughts?
Kelvin. On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: >> relativepath. Maybe we should have a quick look at some other project >> samples to see what they do. >> >> ...ant >> > > Good idea. Looking Axis most samples seem to rely on an Ant build.xml. > Some do have pom.xml but some have no parent specified and others have > the top level parent specified. Not sure we can learn much from that > other than maybe we should consider not have poms at all? Although > that seems to make life difficult for those who do like maven. > > Simon > > -- > Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org > Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com >
