+1 for single pdf. I think the chances of it getting out-dated or not reflecting the current structure of the directories are considerably less than multiple readme-s.
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Florian MOGA <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > I'm on vacation and a bit out-dated with the mailing list but if we're > still up to making a clean separation between sca and tuscany features, the > following names came to me which seem self explanatory: oasis-spec-features > / extra-features. > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 6:09 PM, kelvin goodson > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> OK, thanks Simon, I'll take a look. >> >> Kelvin. >> >> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi Kelvin >> > >> > I just edited the new samples doc page you created [1] to make some >> > suggestions about >> > >> > 1/ locating some of the helloworld samples >> > 2/ removing launcher from the front of the "running-tuscany" samples >> > 3/ moving the implementation-osgi sample up one level and hence >> > loosing the sub-directory under distributed OSGi >> > >> > Haven't made any changes in the code. >> > >> > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYxDOCx2x/Samples >> > >> > Simon >> > >> > -- >> > Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org >> > Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com >> > >> > >
