Good remark, didn't know about it. On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Florian MOGA <[email protected]> wrote: > > What about a Samples category as well? > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Florian MOGA <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Brent, > >> The idea for the User folder is that it would help us avoid issues being > >> assigned to the wrong category (might not be the case for such general > >> categories) but most important user reported issues will go through a > triage > >> phase and become "official" issues after we take a look at them. It will > >> also be a measure for us to monitor how much user activity we have and > the > >> common problems they are facing. > >> The Ideas section would be destined for things like "How about having an > >> implementation.jpa?". Google Summer of Code project ideas would fit in > too. > >> As a high level view it would contain ideas that also need some research > or > >> it is not sure that something like that is possible. It would basically > be a > >> place where to store the ideas you have and don't have time to expoit in > >> order not to forget them. At some point I saw a page on the tuscany > website > >> trying to do this but I can't find it at the moment... > >> The main idea is that user issues might be so many that they would make > >> the list verbose and the ideas issues would be such a small number that > it > >> will be hard to find them. I don't know exactly but I'm expecting that > from > >> the current opened issues a big part are user reported issues which most > of > >> them are out dated, not affecting them or we don't have any clue about > them > >> anymore. > >> Does this make sense? > >> Florian > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Brent Daniel <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 on the shortened list of JIRA categories. The current granularity > >>> doesn't seem to be all that helpful. I'm not sure if there needs to be > >>> a separate section for user questions -- with the shortened list it > >>> should be possible for even the newest of users to find a home for a > >>> JIRA. Similarly for "Ideas", it seems like most issues would fit into > >>> one of the other categories. Are there current examples of JIRAs that > >>> would fit best in a separate "Ideas" section? > >>> > >>> Brent > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Florian MOGA <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > Since we're cleaning up things I took a look again at the JIRA > >>> > Categories. I > >>> > propose simply having: > >>> > Java SCA > >>> > Java SDO > >>> > Java DAS > >>> > C++ SCA > >>> > C++ SDO > >>> > C++ DAS > >>> > OASIS > >>> > Tools (including Hudson, Maven, SVN issues) > >>> > Website/Documentation > >>> > User Questions > >>> > Ideas > >>> > > >>> > instead of having ~30 categories which nobody uses... It seems > simpler > >>> > and > >>> > gives us the functionality we need out of it. > >>> > Regarding the User Questions section we can let users report issues > in > >>> > there > >>> > and only after an investigation from our side we can "promote" them > to > >>> > the > >>> > appropriate category. Seems fair enough... > >>> > SDO and DAS sections seem to have some a considerable number of > issues > >>> > opened (~20%). How can we clean those up? > >>> > > >>> > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Luciano Resende < > [email protected]> > >>> > wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Simon Laws > >>> >> <[email protected]> > >>> >> wrote: > >>> >> > Current status > >>> >> > 1500 closed > >>> >> > 1560 resolved > >>> >> > 500 Open (365 SCA) > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Each person, for those that you've opened > >>> >> > Close resolved ones > >>> >> > Close open JIRA that no longer apply > >>> >> > Can do this without sending email although the check box seems > to > >>> >> > have been removed > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> I'm not seeing the option to "transition jiras" without sending > >>> >> e-mails, do I need to be admin to do that ? otherwise I don't think > we > >>> >> want 200 more e-mails just to move from fixed to close :) > >>> >> > >>> >> > For JIRA that fall out of this process > >>> >> > Take it to the list > >>> >> > Mail back to the user? > >>> >> > We can try and group correctly - Feature request vs Bug > >>> >> > Use "will not fix" if we really think we're not going to do > >>> >> > anything > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Categories > >>> >> > general dissatisfaction with JIRA categories we have as they are > >>> >> > not really used > >>> >> > Try to convert to a shorter list (should try and match > >>> >> > distribution structure?) > >>> >> > base runtime > >>> >> > binding.ws > >>> >> > binding.jms > >>> >> > etc for the main extensions > >>> >> > Look at this list when we've talked about release artifacts > >>> >> > Encourage people to use unknown rather than guessing > >>> >> > SCA Java is default so would need SCA Native, SDO Java etc > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> There are several uncategorized ones, should we handle those as well > ? > >>> >> > >>> >> -- > >>> >> Luciano Resende > >>> >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende > >>> >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > >>> >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > I'd like to maintain the two OASIS categories as it distinguishes > between those issues Tuscany has to do something about and those > issues that OASIS have to do something about. > > Other than that I'm +1 on reducing the granularity. > > Simon > > -- > Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org > Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com >
