On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: >> Well the informal rule I've tried to apply so far in these kinds of cases is >> >> 1 - if we mention things that aren't in the distro then it's not great >> but I could live with it until the next distro >> 2 - if we don't mention things that are in the distro then that's not so >> good. >> >> There are several things that come under category 1 but I could live with >> them >> binding-ws, databinding-jaxb-axiom, interface-wsdl come under category >> 2 w.r.t that last license. The problem with this is where do you stop. >> > > Ok, I'll look into this over the weekend and provide a new RC > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
Hi Luciano I was looking at this and have a couple of LICENSE changes I'll commit shortly for review. Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
