Luciano Resende wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Simon Nash <[email protected]> wrote:
I've looked at the modules, samples and tools directories as released
in 1.6, and I've also looked at the contents of the maven repo.
(cut)
The *-dojo modules should not be removed. There is an issue if we have
both javascript frameworks on the binary distro and how we choose the
default one. I believe a very similar issue happens with
binding-sca-corba and binding-sca-jms extensions and host-tomcat.
It should be fine to have the dojo modules in the modules directory
of the binary distro as long as they aren't included in tuscany-sca-all
or tuscany-sca-manifest. They can be picked up by explicit references
from a build.xml file generated by tuscany-maven-ant-generator.
I've tried this approach to run the store-dojo sample and it works fine
using the generated build.xml file. I also had to change the host-tomcat
dependency to a host-jetty dependency because the 3rdparty tomcat
dependencies aren't included in the binary distro. I tried the store
sample as well, and the extra modules didn't cause any problems.
I'd like to add the dojo modules to the modules directory of the binary
distro and add the store-dojo sample to show how to use these modules.
This is much simpler than requiring users to download these modules manually
from the maven repo and figure out how to use them. I would include a note
in the release documentation explaining why these modules can't be part of
tuscany-sca-all and tuscany-sca-manifest. Is there agreement on this?
Simon
