Hi to all,
with your help I've almost finished my project, anyway I've a problem about
namespaces... in my example I want to use not onlt my own developed
implementation but also the classical implementation.java, but it gives me
error about not finding that implementation...

My composite is :

<composite xmlns="http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0";
targetNamespace="http://test/helloworld2";
xmlns:p="http://asm";
name="helloworld2">
  <component name="HelloWorldRefComponent">
    <service name="HelloWorldRefService">
      <interface.java interface="helloworld.HelloWorldService"/>
    </service>
    <reference name="salutoService"/>
    <p:implementation.asm location="HelloWorldRefServiceComponent.asm"/>
  </component>
  <component name="SalutoComponent">
    <service name="SalutoService">
    <interface.java interface="helloworld.SalutoService"/>
    </service>
    <implementation.java class="helloworld.SalutoServiceImpl"/>
   </component>
  <wire source="HelloWorldRefComponent/salutoService"
target="SalutoComponent/SalutoService"/>
</composite>

and the error is :

AVVERTENZA: Inesistent implementation (something like that, in italian :) ):
Component = SalutoComponent
22-ott-2010 17.38.21
org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.builder.impl.CompositeBindingURIBuilderImpl

Any ideas?

Thank you very much!


2010/10/19 Simon Nash <[email protected]>

> Fabio Albani wrote:
>
>> Hi to all,
>>
>> I needed that because I'm developing an implementation for Asmeta
>> language, a language for describing Abstract State Machines. In order to
>> call methods, with ASM rules, in the way I've developed for my master degree
>> work, and not the Tuscany's one, I couldn't use the usual way for resolving
>> models... Now, using an ArtifactProcessor also on the composite, like in the
>> "AnyElement" class file, I can call, in an ASM-like way, method on an ASM
>> agent generated on-the-fly which is a wrapper for any kind of service.
>>
>> Only a question... how can I get the return value from a service knowing
>> only parameters and name of the service (and of the component exposing it) ?
>>
>>  I think you mean the return value of a service operation.
>
> 1. From the component, get the list of services.
> 2. From the list of services, get the service (by name matching).
> 3. From the service, get the InterfaceContract.
> 4. From the InterfaceContract, get the Interface.
> 5. Now you need to determine what type of interface it is (e.g., a
>   JavaInterface), and use language-specific code to introspect the
>   interface to get the names, parameters, and return type of each
>   of its operations.  Each interface type has a different way of
>   doing this.
>
>  Simon
>
>  Thanks for your help :)
>>
>> Fabio
>>
>> 2010/10/16 Luciano Resende <[email protected] <mailto:
>> [email protected]>>
>>
>>
>>    On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Fabio Albani
>>    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>     > Hi to all,
>>     > I noticed I've already done that, but I can't manage how to use
>>     > CompositeProcessor in order to use thw whole composite... is it
>>    possibile to
>>     > get ALL the xml of the current composite in use in the extension?
>>     > The problem is that I haven't interface defined and so I use a
>>    custom way to
>>     > call other services from the reference, but I need to read
>>    attributes like
>>     > references, target etc.
>>     > Thank you!
>>     >
>>
>>    Maybe you are trying to do things on the different phase ? In the read
>>    phase, we only delegate to processors that know how to read pieces of
>>    the composite and generate models, we then have a resolve phase where
>>    these models get resolved. Later on, your extension will be
>>    initialized and you will have access to the further runtime artifacts
>>    (see BindingProviderFactory ServiceBindingProviders,
>>    ReferenceBindingProviders) and then the actual invokers or
>>    servletListeners will also be able to play a part during the
>>    invocation. Maybe what you are trying to do fits better to a different
>>    phase or actually during the start or invocation process ?
>>
>>
>>    --
>>    Luciano Resende
>>    http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>>    http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>>    http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to