On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:36 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >> To see where we're at I've built a release based on the current trunk, >> the source and binary distributions are at: >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/next/ >> >> There are some RAT issues with the source distribution for which i've >> raised a TUSCANY-https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3731, >> and there's obviously still work required on the samples. Once the RAT >> issue are fixed though i think this is in a state that could be >> released and it just how much tidy up we want to do. >> >> The release build works and is easy now, that was done with just mvn >> -Prelease -DaltDeploymentRepository=id::default::file:target/deploy >> -Dgpg.skip, omitting the DaltDeploymentRepository it would have all >> gone to nexus or a different DaltDeploymentRepository value could send >> it to a people.apache.org space like we used to do, so there's now >> theres no fuffing about with signing and uploading individual bits and >> pieces. > > Thanks for sorting this out ant >> >> How about based on this we spend the rest of the week reviewing and >> cleaning things up and then cut a real RC1 first thing next week. > > Sounds good to me. >
I've taken a branch for the release now: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/branches/2.0-Beta1/ I'm doing builds and spinning an RC from that now to see how it looks. There are starting to get quite a lot of JIRAs open against it that we need to decide what to do with, a lot of them look like things we need to fix for the release to me, see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310210&fixfor=12315204 ...ant
