On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Brent Daniel <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Brent Daniel <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>>>> Also, for some reason when I run the legal check it's reporting that >>>>> jsr173_api-1.0.jar does not have a LICENSE entry. >>>> >>>> In this case where are you running the legal check from? I don't see >>>> jsr173 in the binary distro either. >>> >>> It's running from the source build. The jar seems to be getting pulled >>> into WEB-INF/lib for the WAR based samples. >>> >>> Brent >>> >> >> Ah, didn't look there but interesting that the src legal check didn't >> pick it up for me. I'll look into it. >> > > After manually removing everything under javax.xml.bind in my local > repository and re-running the build it seems to have gone away, so the > distribution is probably fine. I'm still confused on why it was being > pulled in, though. > > Brent >
I haven't got any to report here yet but in the mean time are there any other comments on this RC. It's not clear Brent whether you went through the whole RC and this was the only thing you found (somehow I doubt this is the only thing to be found) or whether this was the first thing you found? Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
