I'd like to start merging the changes i have to support choosing the sca
binding impl on a per service/reference basis (binding-sca-runtime2 + some
local changes) into binding-sca-runtime, if i do that now is it going to get
in the way of what you're doing?
...ant
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]>wrote:
> A quick update.
>
> On Friday I checked some changes in as a first pass of an
> implementation of the 2nd option in my previous mail to this thread.
> I.e. making the forward reference responsible for installing a
> response listener and updating the EndpointReference and Endpoint, and
> the associated invocation chains, to make them responsible for
> processing any asynchronous responses along the response part of the
> forward chain (on both reference and service side).
>
> There are some new implementation and binding provider interfaces for
> creating an AsyncResponseInvoker on the service and reference sides.
> I'm updating the wiki page [1] to show the service side as well as the
> reference side.
>
> The status of the changes is that they are currently very rough with
> lots of outstanding issues (i'll post separately on them) and the
> updated implementation sample demonstrates the native async operation
> with binding.sca. The limited nature of this though means that the
> databinding interceptor doesn't get invoked. So my next steps at to
> improve the sample to prove that the approach will really work and,
> assuming that it does, start improving the code to fix all the issues
> I'm aware of. I'd also like to convert a remote binding to demonstrate
> native async operation.
>
> [1]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Asynch+Infrastructure
> [2]
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/unreleased/samples/implementation-sample-async/
>
> Simon
>
> --
> Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
> Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
>
