On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:47 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > > IMHO the web20 feature is too course grained and drags in too many > dependencies that you don't need. The point of the base + extension approach > is that it makes it easy to work out what you need, you always have base and > you add *-runtime jars for any extensions used in the SCA composites, and > thats what we've been changing all the samples to demonstrate. Not all the > extensions work completely like this yet, eg implementation-widget, because > of those dojo extensions, but if we can merge those into other runtime > modules then the issue goes away. >
I don't think we ever going to agree in the right granularity, having said that, we have a way to solve this no matter what granularity we want. The web 2.0 is an easy way for people to start building web 2.0 related applications and have all the necessary infrastructure building blocks available. This can also be accomplished by having more fine grained aggregation by extension (e.g implementation-widget extension granularity), which is fine if you want to do it and have a requirement for it. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
