Mmm, i've not debugged it at all but the fails I see are due to loop in xmlschema code so r1043206 seems suspicious.
...ant On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]>wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:06 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > > The versions of the xsd's that are planned to be final ones have just > been > > published by OASIS so we should move up to them which would also help > test > > them for OASIS, see: > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/201012/msg00000.html > > > > ...ant > > > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> I'm trying to fix it ... > >> ________________________________________________________________ > >> Raymond Feng > >> [email protected] > >> Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org > >> Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com > >> Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com > >> ________________________________________________________________ > >> On Dec 7, 2010, at 10:15 PM, Raymond Feng wrote: > >> > >> After debugging into the problem, I found out the OASIS OpenCSA XSDs for > >> SCA specs (pulled into Tuscany under assmbly-xsd project) are > inconsistent. > >> For example, > >> sca-core-1.1-cd05-rev1.xsd includes sca-policy-1.1-cd03-rev1.xsd > >> sca-policy-1.1-cd03-rev1.xsd includes sca-core-1.1-cd06.xsd (doesn't > >> exist) > >> Any chance to fix the XSDs? > >> [1] > http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/svn/sca-assembly/SCA_XSDS/ > >> On Dec 7, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Apache Hudson Server wrote: > >> > >> See > >> < > https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Tuscany-2x/org.apache.tuscany.sca$tuscany-compliance-test-assembly/9/ > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > And why did it just start failing last night? Did we change something? > > Simon > > -- > Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org > Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com >
