On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Simon Laws <simonsl...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Ok let me go do that. While doing that i'd also quite like to update
>> the message output by the endpoint registry addEndpoint to include the
>> binding type and binding URI and to not include the Endpoint hashcode,
>> say if anyone has concerns or updates on that.
>>
>>   ...ant
>>
>
> Fine by me.
>
> As separate question though about how this is controlled. We have
> properties you can pass into a node now. Have we a list of what
> properties you can provide anywhere?
>

No list no. Its not used that much and at least some of what is used
at present i'd like to change.

For this one for now i'll add a constant to the RuntimeProperties interface.

   ...ant

Reply via email to