On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Simon Laws <simonsl...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> >> >> Ok let me go do that. While doing that i'd also quite like to update >> the message output by the endpoint registry addEndpoint to include the >> binding type and binding URI and to not include the Endpoint hashcode, >> say if anyone has concerns or updates on that. >> >> ...ant >> > > Fine by me. > > As separate question though about how this is controlled. We have > properties you can pass into a node now. Have we a list of what > properties you can provide anywhere? >
No list no. Its not used that much and at least some of what is used at present i'd like to change. For this one for now i'll add a constant to the RuntimeProperties interface. ...ant