On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Mike Edwards <mike.edwards.inglen...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/02/2011 14:16, ant elder wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Mike Edwards >> <mike.edwards.inglen...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 01/02/2011 13:55, ant elder wrote: >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Mike Edwards >>>> <mike.edwards.inglen...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 30/01/2011 10:08, ant elder wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Please review and vote on RC2 of the Java SCA 2.0 Beta2 release. >>>>>> >>>>>> The artifacts are at: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-beta2-RC2/ >>>>>> >>>>>> The release tag is at: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta2-RC2 >>>>>> >>>>>> Here's my +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> ...ant >>>>>> >>>>> I get a build test failure when I do a clean build of the source >>>>> distribution. >>>>> >>>>> The failure is with the Legal Checks iTest >>>>> >>>>> The surefire output: >>>>> >>>>> </error> >>>>> <system-err>Jars in distribution but not in LICENSE: >>>>> [jaxme-api-0.3.jar] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I checked the dependency tree for jaxme and it derives from >>>>> implementation-bpel: >>>>> >>>>> [INFO] | +- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> org.apache.tuscany.sca:tuscany-implementation-bpel-runtime:jar:2.0-Beta2:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- org.apache.ode:ode-bpel-epr:jar:1.3.2:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- org.apache.ode:ode-bpel-store:jar:1.3.2:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- org.apache.ode:ode-bpel-dao:jar:1.3.2:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- org.apache.ode:ode-dao-jpa:jar:1.3.2:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- org.apache.ode:ode-dao-jpa-ojpa-derby:zip:1.3.2:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- org.apache.ode:ode-bpel-runtime:jar:1.3.2:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- org.apache.ode:ode-bpel-api:jar:1.3.2:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- org.apache.ode:ode-scheduler-simple:jar:1.3.2:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- org.apache.ode:ode-utils:jar:1.3.2:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- org.apache.ode:ode-bpel-compiler:jar:1.3.2:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- org.apache.ode:ode-bpel-schemas:jar:1.3.2:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- org.apache.ode:ode-bpel-obj:jar:1.3.2:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- org.apache.ode:ode-jacob:jar:1.3.2:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- org.apache.ode:ode-jacob-ap:jar:1.3.2:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- org.apache.ode:ode-agents:jar:1.3.2:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- org.apache.ode:ode-dao-hibernate:jar:1.3.2:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- >>>>> org.eclipse.equinox:common:jar:3.5.0-v20090520-1800:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- commons-lang:commons-lang:jar:2.3:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- commons-collections:commons-collections:jar:3.2:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- >>>>> org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-kernel:jar:2.0.1:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- >>>>> org.apache.geronimo.components:geronimo-transaction:jar:2.1.4:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | | +- org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.6.1:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | | \- org.objectweb.howl:howl:jar:1.0.1-1:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- >>>>> org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-jta_1.1_spec:jar:1.1.1:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- >>>>> org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec:jar:1.1.1:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec:jar:2.0.0:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- >>>>> org.apache.geronimo.components:geronimo-connector:jar:2.1.4:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- org.apache.derby:derby:jar:10.4.1.3:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- tranql:tranql-connector:jar:1.1:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | | \- regexp:regexp:jar:1.3:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- org.apache.openjpa:openjpa:jar:1.2.1:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | | \- commons-pool:commons-pool:jar:1.3:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- net.sourceforge.serp:serp:jar:1.13.1:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | +- jaxen:jaxen:jar:1.1.1:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | | +- dom4j:dom4j:jar:1.6.1:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | | | \- jaxme:jaxme-api:jar:0.3:compile >>>>> [INFO] | | | \- jdom:jdom:jar:1.0:compile >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why this should pop up now I have no idea - presumably some 3rd party >>>>> dependecncy has changed. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Jaxme is defined in the dom4j pom.xml as an optional dependency so it >>>> shouldn't be getting included, and it doesn't get included in my build >>>> of the distribution so the license itest passing cleanly. Its odd that >>>> jaxme is getting included in your build: >>>> - what version of Maven are you using? >>>> - there are no changes related to this that i can see between >>>> trunk/bete2, does jaxme show up in your trunk build? >>>> >>>> ...ant >>>> >>> Ant, >>> >>> Maven is 2.2.0 >>> >>> Can't see it in my trunk build at the moment but I need to do a fresh >>> build >>> of that >>> >>> >>> Yours, Mike. >>> >> >> I can't think of anything to explain why you get that and i don't. >> >> Would you look in the dom4j pom.xml in your local repository to verify >> that the jaxme dependency is optional, eg C:\Documents and >> Settings\Administrator\.m2\repository\dom4j\dom4j\1.6.1\dom4j-1.6.1.pom: >> >> <dependency> >> <groupId>jaxme</groupId> >> <artifactId>jaxme-api</artifactId> >> <version>0.3</version> >> <optional>true</optional> >> </dependency> >> >> ...ant >> > Ant, > > I can confirm that I see the exact same problem with my trunk build. > > When I look at my repo and the POM for dom4j, I see this: > > <dependency> > <groupId>jaxme</groupId> > <artifactId>jaxme-api</artifactId> > <version>0.3</version> > </dependency> > > - clearly not optional.. > > this is dom4j 1.6.1 from a clean repo as of today. > > > Yours, Mike. >
The pom.xml in the central repository has it as optional: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/dom4j/dom4j/1.6.1/dom4j-1.6.1.pom Perhaps the one you have is from when we had all the other repositories defined in tuscany and one of them had a duff version? Could you try deleting it from your local repo and seeing if a fresh build downloads a good version and if not where its downloading it from? ...ant
