I'm not sure if you misunderstood my point :-) I meant to say when we found broken functions in Tuscany that fail the test cases, we should track the failures instead of disabling the code path to fool the test cases. I just don't want to see that we cheat ourselves (if so, we can set the surefire skip flag to get all the tests passing :-(
Back to now, I'm trying to fix the underlying issues so that we can REALLY get the test cases passing. I guess that's what you would like to see. Thanks, Raymond ________________________________________________________________ Raymond Feng rf...@apache.org Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com ________________________________________________________________ On Feb 1, 2011, at 3:07 PM, Mike Edwards wrote: > On 01/02/2011 22:53, Raymond Feng wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would rather that we "ignore" the failing test cases with JIRA >> tickets so that we won't forget to fix it. > Raymond, > > On that point, at this stage, I totally disagree. > > Fix the function so that it passes the tests BEFORE putting it back in. > > I will be very disappointed if I find more OASIS conformance tests failing... > > > Yours, Mike.
