On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Simon Nash <n...@apache.org> wrote: >> I do agree good quality samples are important for users though. Maybe >> if we have this more strict quality approach then we also need to do >> some vetting of what goes into samples so there isn't so many of them >> and try to include just a few main ones in the releases, perhaps with >> others available in SVN which we document as available? >> >> ...ant >> >> > That's exactly what I was suggesting. Quality is more important than > quantity. Let's be selective and only include samples in a release if > they are working and have some documentation saying how to run them. > For those that make the cut, I think there is a requirement to keep > them working in future releases (both major and minor), so let's make > the selection with that in mind. >
That wasn't quite what i was suggesting, I meant a include only a small and controlled set of samples of samples. I don't think it scales with everyone able to add any old sample they happen to like and have that require for ever more that it is manually reviewed by everyone at every release time and any issues be release blockers. ...ant
