Before trying to tackle https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3832 I was trying to deal with the fact that I broke the binding-corba-runtime module tests, hitting a CORBA MARSHAL exception.
This module does use a mock 'TestOperation' (which implements Operation which I'd changed in my patch), leading me to think maybe I was dealing with an incompatible change serialization type of issue. But I'm kind of stuck. I don't see us actually passing TestOperation as a parameter. In looking at the IDL I don't see why I'd need to do another idl2java, but maybe I'm wrong. I don't know CORBA all that well and was wondering if anyone had any ideas.... When I use the Sun JDK (1.6) I see: org.omg.CORBA.MARSHAL: vmcid: SUN minor code: 207 completed: No When I use the IBM JDK (1.6): org.omg.CORBA.MARSHAL: No available data: Request 14:read beyond end of data. No fragments available. vmcid: OMG minor code: 8 completed: Maybe Here are the failed tests: test_primitivesSetter(org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.corba.testing.CorbaServantTestCase) test_arraysSetter(org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.corba.testing.CorbaServantTestCase) test_TestObject_setStruct(org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.corba.testing.CorbaServantTestCase) test_enums(org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.corba.testing.CorbaServantTestCase) test_nonCorbaServants(org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.corba.testing.CorbaServantTestCase) test_arraysPassing(org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.corba.testing.CorbaServantTestCase) I'm doing an offline mvn so I don't overwrite my local changes to other modules. I found this post suggesting the Sun JDK 207 code could be addressed by using the IBM ORB in the Sun JDK http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=14036393 but I'm guessing that using the IBM JDK is just as good. Any ideas?? Thanks, Scott
