On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Simon Nash <n...@apache.org> wrote: > ant elder wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:17 AM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Simon Nash <n...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>>> Actually I would wonder what is the point of using maven to generate >>>> an ant script that does exactly the same as the maven build. >>>> >>>> In 1.x the ant scripts were provided as an alternative to maven that >>>> use local artifacts from the binary distro instead of depending on >>>> remote repositories. >> >> I meant to add, if working offline using local artifacts is >> useful/important then i wonder if that should also be possible with >> the Maven builds in the binary distribution. It might be nice if both >> the Ant and Maven builds could both work offline using the >> distribution artifacts, which would probably mean having the jars in >> the hierarchical directory structure that maven uses and having the >> Tuscany standalone runtimes work with that. At least that would then >> have the jars in a fairly common and understandable structure. >> >> ...ant >> >> > From this I presume you mean having these jars under the Tuscany > installation directory rather than in the user's local maven repo. > > This seems like a good idea as it's first step to creating a more > embeddable Tuscany runtime installation. > > Simon >
Does anyone know how to do that? It sounds like something someone else must have wanted to do before, i guess with the assmbly plugin you must be able to find the local repo and include that in a distribution? ...ant
