On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Simon Laws <simonsl...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> What shall we call this next release? Following on from the last >>> release it would be 2.0-Beta3, another option could be 2.0. What else >>> do we need to get done before we're ready for a 2.0 release? If its a >>> short list of todo's should we just work on getting those done and >>> going straight to 2.0 for the next release? >>> >> >> Any comments on the release name? >> >> I'm back from being on holiday now and it looks like there are enough >> others active to get a release vote out so I'd like to have another go >> and getting a release out. Unless anyone asks otherwise I'll probably >> do a bit of clean up and review this week and cut an RC next week. >> >> ...ant >> > > I've noticed some discussion on the OASIS list about the optional > requirements and associated tests. Maybe Mike would be better placed > to comment on any likely implications. I'd say go with 2.0-beta3 until > the dust is settled in case we have to change anything. >
Ok i guess thats fine for this release just to get it done. I do think we should revisit the when to do the 2.0 release though. I know we've been waiting till OASIS does the 1.1 spec releases but with all the politics and time thats taking i think it might be better for Tuscany if we do 2.0 sooner and a later 2.x for OASIS. ...ant
