On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:24 AM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Simon Laws <simonsl...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > <snip> > >> I ended up finding that I was pretty comfortable about having a domain >> on disc and then starting nodes with minimal configuration, I'd like >> to look at working this up into a real piece of code in the shell or >> the launcher. Anyone have any thoughts about this. >> > > I've been wondering how to do a similar type of thing but in as simple > as possible a way and so i'd quite like to avoid having to use a > node.xml file. An alternative could be to use the file directory names > to define what the domain/node looks like. To explore that I've added > a new method createNode(File) to TuscanyRuntime where the File points > to a file system directory which contains all the contributions and > configuration. There's a test DirectoryDomainTestCase and a couple of > test domain folders at: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/domain-node/src/test/resources/test-domains. > This looks like it has some potential to me, and it could be used to > extend the existing support for contribution folders in places like > the webapp runtime and Tomcat deep integration. > > ...ant >
Just for comparison. [1] was what I came up with. I was also using directory names as a convention for naming the domain and the nodes running within it. Looking at the test-domain version what do the composite file and xml file at the top level mean? Also where is the configuration that tells you what is running where? Is that separate? [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/testing/itest/nodes/two-jvm-hazelcast/src/test/resources/ Regards Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
