[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057469#comment-13057469
]
Scott Kurz commented on TUSCANY-3884:
-------------------------------------
I just realized a more fundamental issue with using copyXXX is that it assumes
both source and target use the same databinding. At least, the
JAXBDataBinding.copy() assumes both source and target are JAXB.
So one thing I can see a need for in a delegate impl is the usage of a WSDL
operation to model the binding operation and the use of mediateXXX to transform.
> binding.sca local delegation
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-3884
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3884
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-Beta2
> Reporter: Simon Laws
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0
>
>
> Binding.sca currently delegates for remote semantics but implements local
> semantics in it's own provider. Should we create a separate local binding an
> delegate to that so it can we swapped out without affecting the provider
> functionality.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
