If C1 does not specify a binding, it inherits it from C2's composite service (which might in turn inherit it from the component service).
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Scott Kurz <sku...@gmail.com> wrote: > Trying to understand myself as the spec doesn't seem crystal clear... > > I assume we'd agree also that the answer should be the same for this > variation: > > composite B with component C2 > > <service name="S1Promoted" promote="C2"> > <binding.ws/> <!-- Binding now specified on composite service > --> > </service> > <component name="C2"> > <implementation.java class="..."/> > <service name="S1"> > <binding.ws/> > </service> > </component> > > In contrast, suppose we that composite A with component C1 did not > explicitly specify > <binding.sca>, e.g.: > > <component name="C1"> > <implementation.composite name="B"/> > <service name="S1Promoted"/> > </component> > > Should this be <binding.ws> then? Does it matter whether B's > composite-level service has the binding or not? > > Scott >
