On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Greg Dritschler <greg.dritsch...@gmail.com> wrote: > I noticed this in the Java CAA spec: > 3177 The @Remotable annotation has no attributes. When placed on a Java > service interface, it indicates that > 3178 the interface is remotable. When placed on a Java service > implementation class, it indicates that all SCA > 3179 service interfaces provided by the class (including the class itself, > if the class defines an SCA service > 3180 interface) are remotable. When placed on a service reference, it > indicates that the interface for the > 3181 reference is remotable. > I thought this could be useful to me in writing some local and remote tests > using a common interface. I tried the following. > @Reference > @Remotable > public Service1 reference1; > This fails with a compile error: annotation type not applicable to this > kind of declaration. > I notice that the Remotable annotation class in Tuscany has @Target(TYPE). > The spec says it is supposed to be @Target(TYPE,METHOD,FIELD,PARAMETER). > I also notice that ReferenceProcessor doesn't have any code to deal with > Remotable. > If this is supposed to work, I'm willing to take a crack at fixing it. > On a positive note, it looks to me like ServiceProcessor has code to > propagate @Remotable on the implementation class to the services interfaces, > so that side might be in good shape. > Greg
I agree that sounds like a bug so if you want to take a crack at fixing it then go for it. ...ant
