On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Raymond Feng <enjoyj...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > Before the changes, we use jabsorb as the jsonrpc 1.0 implementation. I > decided to use a home grown for number of reasons: > 1) The jsonrpc protocol is simple enough. I'm trying to avoid the dependency > to a non-active 3rd party project > 2) I'm trying to leverage Jackson to improve performance > 3) I want to use JSONRPC 2.0 at some point for binding.sca remoting > 4) I want to try gzip encoding for some situations
Great, let me pickup the compression support. Also, I noticed that there seems to be some issues with the current response, which seems to always send error ? Per the 2.0 spec, error should only be sent if there is an error. I'll investigate this issue as well. Below is what I see while running the JSON-RPC tests. Response as null:{"id":1,"result":"echo: Hello JSON-RPC","error":null} [1] http://jsonrpc.org/spec.html -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/