On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 10:38 -0800, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Thomas Gentsch <t...@e-tge.de> wrote: > > Hi JS + all, > > we are using Tuscany C++ in one of our projects, hence we/I > have some > personal interest and also would like to contribute, if > possible. > > Tbh, I don't know details about C++11 (will read a bit) nor > the other > things you mention. > > > Great! Papers from the C++11 standard work groups are available on > open-std.org there [1]. The final ISO standard is not free but the > last draft [2] is free. If you just want a high level overview > there's one on Wikipedia [3]. Hope that helps.
Shortly looked through it, definitely interesting. Of course that makes me worry a bit how far compilers support this already ... particularly as partially maybe (as in our case) older OS versions are to be supported. > One thing though which appears quite important to me is that > the various > patches we/I have done (most/all (?) submitted to Jira) and > other people > are incorporated into the general code so that they are in the > next > release if there will ever be one ... and of course this is > easier > before any refactorings. > > > I found one JIRA with a patch from you [4], which looks like a change > to the SDO + Axiom support in the SCA-Native-M3 release. I quickly looked into Jira and found at least these: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3841 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3715 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3597 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1552 > > The C++ trunk has already gone through some refactoring and quite a > few changes over time since M3... There's no SDO anymore Oh!!! Actually I always believed Tuscany is mainly about SDO! Well, then I have to correct myself - we are using Tuscany C++ SDO. I wasn't aware of this at all (haven't looked into it for a while though) > (like the Java trunk, which I believe dropped SDO as well), the > composite files use the new SCDL from OASIS, the runtime integrates > with Apache HTTPD, etc. There's still an integration with Axis2C but > I've not looked at it for a very long time. > > > So, if you're still using SDO you'll probably want to stick to the M3 > level, but I can help apply your patch to a maintenance branch off M3 > at some point if that helps. Well, if SDO is dead anyway then there will not be any release anymore I suppose, so maybe no need to bother. > > The other thing: Are the planned changes going to modify the > API > interface or is it just internally? > > > The C++11 changes only apply to the runtime internals, but again if > you're using the SDO-based API from M3, that already changed a long > time ago. OK, then I should look into the alternatives? Is there any replacement? Many thx + regards, tge > > Rgds, > tge > > > > > [1] http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/ > [2] http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/n3242.pdf > [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B11 > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3598
