Trying to summarizing the discussions, thanks @ANSHUMAN.TRIPATHY for bringing up the RFC :
- S0: Currently chainer deployment can go through the ONNX path. chainer->ONNX->tvm allows us to leverage the more robust ONNX path. - S1: Because chainer -> ONNX stops developments, there is a concern that chainer->ONNX may no longer keep up to date, and was the main argument for introducing the chainer frontend. Both arguments has valid points, it would be great to hear thoughts from others. In the meanwhile, @masahi suggested, such conversion support could always be added as a library built on top of the tvm --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/introduce-new-frontend-for-chainer/6129/10) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubscribe/7f0a8605f73596cde3e70cfdc06a6d131bcb771c8384b4815ab5f40580e0ad62).
