ah, Sorry, should've git pulled first. Looks pretty. Bernd
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Andreas Neumann <a...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Bernd, > > where do you see links to modules? I don't see them at all... > > -Andreas. > > > On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Bernd Fondermann < > bernd.fonderm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I run mvn site but all links to the modules won't work. > > > > Otherwise, this is fine for a first site. > > > > Bernd > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Andreas Neumann <a...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > Thanks Patrick. In the meantime Terence had tried out the maven site > > plugin > > > and I think it looks pretty good. I just added a couple of links. > > > > > > Everybody, the current state is in a branch "site", just check it out > and > > > run mvn site and you can see it in your browser under > > > target/site/index.html. > > > How does this look? Is this good enough for an initial website? > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > iirc you can use maven to generate the site and still use CMS. It's > > > > been a while since I looked at it though. Here are some pages to > start > > > > with: > > > > > > > > https://www.apache.org/dev/cmsref.html#external-build > > > > https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/apache_cms_and_external_build > > > > http://apache.org/dev/cmsadoption.html > > > > http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html > > > > > > > > Patrick > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Andreas Neumann <a...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > I have already discarded Sphinx, even though I like it, it seems > more > > > > > appropriate to use a tool that is standard in the Apache community. > > > > > > > > > > I like the suggestion to distinguish between site, wiki, and docs. > > For > > > > the > > > > > site, I see that many projects use the maven site plugin to > generate > > > the > > > > > site, that seems to be the most self-contained and straight-forward > > > > > solution, because maven is a prereq for building Twill anyway. Is > > > there a > > > > > clear advantage of using CMS over maven? > > > > > > > > > > -Andreas. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Take a look at what we did for whirr, there's alot of background > > here: > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-19 > > > > >> > > > > >> I'd strongly suggest you use (or at least seriously consider) > Apache > > > > >> CMS. One question you should answer; what will be on the site, vs > on > > > > >> the wiki, vs in docs that ship with the release. IMO keeping the > > site > > > > >> light, frequently updated docs in wiki, and apis in the release > work > > > > >> well. See cassandra for an example in the extreme: > > > > >> http://cassandra.apache.org/ > > > > >> > > > > >> Patrick > > > > >> > > > > >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Andreas Neumann <a...@apache.org > > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > Since I did not get a response on this, I will assign to myself > > and > > > > take > > > > >> a > > > > >> > first stab. I am gonna try a couple of tools including mvn and > > > sphinx > > > > and > > > > >> > share the results. > > > > >> > -Andreas. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Andreas Neumann < > a...@apache.org > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > >> >> Everybody, > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> bootstrapping the Twill podling is almost complete and the only > > > > >> remaining > > > > >> >> task is to create the website. (TWILL-14). > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> A good way to start would be take the existing Weave > introduction > > > at > > > > >> >> github (https://github.com/continuuity/weave) and adapt it to > > > > Apache. > > > > >> But > > > > >> >> before we can do that, we need to agree on the tool that we > want > > to > > > > use > > > > >> to > > > > >> >> create and maintain the website. We could use the Apache CMS, > we > > > > could > > > > >> use > > > > >> >> the maven plugin, or we could choose a different tool as long > as > > > its > > > > >> >> license allows us to use it and check it in with the source. > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> What do folks on the list suggest / prefer? > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> Cheers -Andreas. > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
