Since we only need this for testing, we can make sure that it stays out of the distribution, by removing this repo from the parent pom, and creating a sub-module for this test that does not produce any artifacts. I will open a new Jira for that and address it later.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Bernd Fondermann < [email protected]> wrote: > I think referencing the Cloudera repo is fine. > The essential question to ask is: Are we _distributing_ anything which is > not compliant with ASF policy? If yes, this could be a problem even though > CDH is open source and ASL. > > Bernd > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 3:34 AM, Andreas Neumann (JIRA) <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > [ > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TWILL-29?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13864991#comment-13864991 > ] > > > > Andreas Neumann commented on TWILL-29: > > -------------------------------------- > > > > While updating the pom, I noticed that it adds the Cloudera repository. > > This is because Twill works against different versions of Hadoop 2, > > including CDH4.5 in which the YARN APIs diverge from all other Apache > > Hadoop releases. To test that Twill still works against CDH4.5, we need > to > > test against the artifacts provided by Cloudera. > > > > My question: Is it ok to use non-Apache repositories in an Apache > > projects? Anybody have advice in this? > > > > If not, then we would have to remove that test. > > > > > > > Update POM file with all Apache information > > > -------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Key: TWILL-29 > > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TWILL-29 > > > Project: Apache Twill > > > Issue Type: Sub-task > > > Reporter: Andreas Neumann > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA > > (v6.1.5#6160) > > >
