Hi Stephan, Thanks for the update! Thanks, Ian On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 19:42, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Ian Laurenson wrote: > > On web page http://udk.openoffice.org/ there is a list of language > > bindings. Is this list up to date? > > Oops, no, it is not. The old problem: those who maintain the page never > read it, and so do not notice it is outdated. :) > > I will update it shortly, thanks for pointing it out, > -Stephan > > > Thanks, Ian > > > > A copy of the relevant section from the page below: > > > > Currently there are complete UNO language bindings for: > > > > * C > > There is not really a C binding. There used to be some experimental > stuff, but it is in unclear condition (and should reside in CVS's attic). > > > * C++ (compiler dependent, please see > > http://porting.openoffice.org for a list of supported platforms) > > * Java > > * Python > > Additionally, there are bindings that allow access to UNO components, > > but do not support the development of new UNO components: > > > > * OpenOffice.org Basic > > * Object Linking and Embedding (OLE) Automation > > * Common Language Infrastructure (CLI). Note: The Microsoft .NET > > framework is an implementation of this standard. The language > > binding does NOT have the status "final" yet. Therefore do NOT > > use it (and programs based on it) in a production environment. > > The CLI bridge is final by now (OOo 2.0), and should indeed be preferred > over the OLE bridge, as it offers more complete functionality. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
