Am Freitag, 10. Juni 2005 09:42 schrieb Stephan Bergmann:
> Arnulf Wiedemann wrote:
> [...]
>
> > I have an additional question in that area:
> > did anyone think about making an urp interface which uses only nested
> > string lists instead of the "bit fiddling" and all the other value types
> > used in the current implementation of bridges/remote/urp which make it
> > sometimes hard to connect to ooo. The interfaces can be unchanged, its
> > only the the stuff read from and written to the socket which would have
> > been added for that kind of interface.
> >
> > My idea is:
> >
> > using a name/value pair for all the parameters, types etc. in the
> > interface. For example a PropertyValue structure could be sent as:
> >
> > {{struct PropertyValue} {{Name Filtername} {Handle -1} {Value MSExcel97}
> > {State 0}}}
> >
> > I think a lot of people using scripting languages could get easier access
> > to ooo.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Arnulf
>
> You mean a "text-based front end" to the URP bridge, so you can talk URP
> "by hand?" No, I am not aware anybody already did anything in that
> direction. But go ahead if you like... :)
>
> -Stephan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the answer Stephan,
I will think about your suggestion to build such a front end.
Cheers,
Arnulf
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
