Hello Stephan, thanks for your fast answer. Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2005 17:51 schrieb Stephan Bergmann: > IIRC, UNO remote bridge protocols are found by library name. That is, > if you have a protocol named xyz (and corresponding accept strings/UNO > URLs would be of the form "...;xyz..." instead of the familiar > "...;urp..."), its implementation would be in in a dynamic library > called libxyz_uno.so (on Unix), similar to the existing liburp_uno.so.
I did not know that it's as easy as to have a corresponding library. So it is enough, if I have built such a library, to copy the new library into the program directory and then the protocol will be recognized (that means there is no registry entry or something similar necessary)? > > > Your client will only work if it connects to an OOo where the URP bridge > endpoint has been modified to understand your extensions. As long as > you keep those modifications private, whether you reuse the name "urp" > is rather irrelevant. However, once you distribute your modified OOo > URP bridge endpoint implementation, you will cause confusion, as it will > be unclear wether or not a given bridge endpoint named "urp" understands > your extensions. (And then, it could well happen that an URP endpoint > implementation is accidentally confronted with your extensions, namely > if your client tries to talk to an arbitrary OOo instance.) Understood. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers, Arnulf --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
