Hi Kay,
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg a écrit :
I'm currently trying to use the URE to build a new application based
on OOo components. For some time I realized that it is very hard to
integrate some components in my application. For example, there are
some helpers in the comphelper which are interesting for
XNameContainer implementation (UNO Type defined in the URE). I'ld
like to use the i18n framework... however is it possible to use it
without OOo ? And what about UNO bridges ?
Good questions, comphelper and friends may be usable without OOo and
with the URE only, but they don't offer any guarantee stay compatible.
Which also is one of the main reasons to exclude them from the URE.
Which compatibility problems are you talking about ? I don't expect the
whole comphelper to be integrated into the URE, however the helpers for
UNO types provided in the URE should be integrated.
Most bridges are already part of the URE, which one are you missing?
Ideally bridges should be deployable (like components) as add-ons.
I really, understand this point of view and I share it... however what
to do with XPCOM bridge ? I know this is an experimental bridge, but it
has to access to the OOo process factory defined in the comphelper...
This would quite hard to solve I think.
I still wonder how I could help to separate this bridge and turn it as a
component. I'll take a deeper look in one or two weeks...
What I want to know is whether it is possible to extract basic
utilities that could be used with the URE. I'm ready to help in this
job, but I'm still wondering what are the plans about the URE.
Some libraries / services should go into the URE. These include
- UCB, probably including the UCB helper library, the
- ConfigMgr and helpers, and the
- UNO package manager.
Waoh, these are really good news :) Thanks for these informations
Cedric
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
