Hi Stephan,
Stephan Bergmann a écrit :
> They are *NOT* equivalent (it is like comparing oranges and apples):
>
> 1 Abstract UNO:
>
> interface X { [attribute, readonly] long A; };
>
> 2 UNO C++ language binding:
>
> class X { public: sal_Int32 getA(); };
>
> sal_Int32 n = o->getA();
>
> 3 UNO Basic language binding:
>
> n = o.A;
>
> Only within 2 (the UNO C++ language binding) does the notion of "getA"
> exist---that is why I earlier wrote that it is an "implementation
> detail" of the UNO C++ language binding.
Ok, I just thought that the o.getA() exists in basic. Now I know it
doesn't ;)
> Hope this explains it better,
Indeed, it's clearer to me, thank you for your patience
Cedric
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
