Hi Bernard, Bernard Marcelly ha scritto: [...] > I just tested again with OOo 1.1.5. It's the same. A method > isSomething() does _not_ produce a pseudo-property Something. > Uno language binding documentation for Basic (and for COM) say nothing > for isSomething() methods. > > You may have been fooled (like me) from the fact that pseudo-property > Modified does exist in OOoBasic. > But it is a write-only property! > Because there is a method setModified(boolean) but no getModified().
opz.... :-) Thank you for checking, of course you are right. My memory was completely wrong, sorry > > In a Calc cell you have a pseudo-property IsMerged which is read-only, > because there is a method getIsMerged(). And there is no method > setIsMerged(boolean), but only the method merge(boolean). > A cleaner naming would have been to define isMerged() instead of > getIsMerged(). And then there would be no pseudo-property. > > In a Calc cell annotation you find the pseudo-property IsVisible because > there is getIsVisible() and setIsVisible(boolean). > Here again it is an awkward naming. It should have simply been named > getVisible() and setVisible(boolean), producing a pseudo-property > Visible. But what's done is done. yes, now I see that there may be some case where method names are not perfectly consistent and I was fooled from them. Of course I can live with it, I have just to remember it for the next time... Thank you again for the detailed explanation and for taking the time . ciao Paolo M --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
