Hi all!

I have worked with blind/visually impaired people at the state level in Ohio for over 17 years and would be glad to offer any information that I can.

Currently I supervise over 60 business operated by people who have visual impairments including total blindness. These blind entrepreneurs depend on Jaws in their computers so they can "read" Word Documents. Jaws is not that good in reading Excel Spreadsheets, or Access databases and it requires a lot of memory. Providing a built in readerin OO would be a way to convince others, especially the blind, to switch to a much better program!

Stu Shear
Ohio Rehabilitation Services Commission
Bureau of Services for the Visually Impaired
(937) 418-7657 (cell)

----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Carrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <dev@ui.openoffice.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 1:14 PM
Subject: [ui-dev] Accessibility in OOo


Hello all,

As you know, Microsoft is claiming that Massachusett's move to OpenDocment would present a problem for people with disabilities. I think their argument is based on the premise that all applications that can read ODF are unable to address disabilities.

Could someone help me respond to this?

Can someone point me to factual information as to how OOo or StarOffice accomodates disabilities? Especially *blind* people, as that seems to be the core of Microsoft's argument.

I will get this information to Peter Quinn so he can support the OpenDocument decision on Monday's meeting.

Your help would be most appreciated.

Cheers,
Daniel.
--
DEMAND __  __  __  http://opendocumentfellowship.org/petition/
      |  ||__)|__|\ |          - Tell Microsoft to support it
      |__||   |__| \|DOCUMENT  - Sign the petition

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to