+1 from me - tested on the rest of the "build" projects, and on all the
uimaj projects.  I also confirmed the license and notice are in the zip
file, and the license header is in the pom.

I've updated our website so the left nav-bar now shows the building-uima
and one-time-setups topics under Development.

-Marshall

On 6/18/2010 9:35 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Correcting the url to use for the staged release, it seems it was
> inserted twice in slightly different forms...
>
> The correct one is just the first one:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-005/
>
> -Marshall
>
> On 6/18/2010 9:58 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
>   
>> The UIMA parent-pom-top, release 2, is ready for testing.
>> It is located here:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-005/org/apache/uima/parent-pom-top/
>>
>> The SVN tag is 
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/build/tags/parent-pom-top-2
>>
>> Suggestted way to test: add this to your maven "settings" in the
>> <profiles> section:
>>
>>     <profile>
>>       <id>staged-release</id>
>>       <repositories>
>>         <repository>
>>           <id>staged-release</id>
>>          
>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-005/ 
>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-005/org/apache/uima/parent-pom-top/>h</url>
>>         </repository>
>>       </repositories>
>>     </profile>
>>
>> and then change the pom(s)-under-test version for the parent-pom-top
>> from "1" or "2-SNAPSHOT" to "2".
>>
>> For more information about this you can read 
>>
>> Then run a maven command with the parameter -Pstaged-release which tells
>> maven to use this profile.
>>
>> The only fix here is for Jira 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1815 to change the 
>> maven-release-plugin version from 2.0-beta-9 to 2.0, in order to pick up the 
>> fixes to support a "flat" hierarchy of projects.  
>>
>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] 0
>> [ ] -1
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>   

Reply via email to