On 10/26/2010 17:14, Marshall Schor wrote: > > > On 10/26/2010 8:02 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: >>> So, well, this isn't quite correct. Things placed here get copied into the >>> top >>> of the top project, not the top level of the archive. >> Couldn't the top project simply be at the top level? Then this >> wouldn't be a problem. Convention over configuration, as they say. >> > > Good point. > > We're currently using a "flat hierarchy" organization for our multi-module > project, due to our Eclipse IDE legacy. > > Archive > top-dir-of-archive > top-project > README > LICENSE > NOTICE > RELEASE_NOTES etc. > other project1 > other project2 > > I was trying for: > > Archive > top-dir-of-archive > top-project > other project1 > other project2 > README > LICENSE > NOTICE > RELEASE_NOTES etc. > > I agree that we could restructure to eliminate the top-dir-of-archive, and > restructure things to have the top-project be that directory. That might > break > some Eclipse things related to multi-module projects, so would need to be > tried > out and tested.
Would it be a problem if the README etc. don't show up in Eclipse? You don't need more than a text editor for those, and you can check in a couple of files from the command line. (Or maybe I'm misunderstood) --Thilo > > -Marshall > >> Jukka Zitting >> >>
