On 1/21/2011 12:28 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Hi all, > > I worked yesterday on putting the LICENSE and NOTICE files > to to OpenNLP project, which is now also at Apache (as many already know). > > As part of that I looked at the UIMA files and wonder why > they only contain the Apache License. Beside the Apache and IBM notice > the Notice file is empty. > > If I remember correctly, then the Cas Editor contains images > which are not AL licensed and came with a Notice. > Wouldn't that for us mean that we have to put the notice > and license in the NOTICE and LICENSE files for both > our binary and source distribution ? >
Yes, this seems correct. I think we incorrectly assumed that the source distribution for base UIMA didn't have content under other licenses and notices, that we were shipping. Can you open a Jira for this, and list (to the extent you can) the items which have to be added? -Marshall > Jörn > > >
