Hello Marshall, 2011/6/6 Marshall Schor <[email protected]>
> I svn "exported" the tag, and diff'ed it to the source-release. > > There are a few differences; although they are not required to be the same, > it's > simpler if they are (mostly). This is because otherwise we have to > carefully > check and confirm that each thing which isn't the same, is OK. Here's a > list of > the differences I found. > > 1) The SVN is organized differently for the osgi components - they are > subdirectories in the addons-osgi-runtime folder, but in the source > release, > they appear at the top level. Does the default behavior of the > source-assembly > change this nesting to a "flat" structure, or are we overriding the default > somehow? > I didn't make any special configuration to do that so I assume it to be the default behavior. > > 2) The alchemy-annotator is named two different ways: in the > source-release it > is called "alchemy-annotator", but in the SVN export it is called > "AlchemyAPIAnnotator" > I think this depends on the artifactId which is "alchemy-annotator" but the directory is called AlchemyAPIAnnotator, I wasn't sure about how to handle it as the "alchemy-annotator" artifactId came from the previous donated project; however I think it'd be good to change it to AlchemyAPIAnnotator. > > 3) There are several projects in the exported tag which are not in the > source > release (I'm guessing because we're not "releasing" these now): > CasViewerEclipsePlugin > GaleMultiModalExample > OpenCalaisAnnotatorGroovy > RDFCASConsumer > SandboxDistr > SandboxDocs > SimpleUimaAsService > > An easy update for this is to manually delete these from the SVN Tag. (For > another email thread - I think it may make sense to have an "addons" SVN > top > node, and "graduate" sandbox things we're releasing, to that). > yes, we don't release them (agree with the idea of separate addons top node) > > 4) The "Notice" file at the SVN top node is out of date; it should match > the > NOTICE file put at the top of the source-release assembly. > I missed that, thanks :-) Regards, Tommaso > Other than these minor issues, the source-release corresponds to the SVN > tag. > Now on to check more things :-) > > -Marshall > >
