Hi,
yes, you are both right and the sandbox is a good place for it.
I'll take a look closer look at all the documents and information on the
webpage/wiki. Is there anything that I shouldn't miss?
What would be the next step?
Peter
Am 15.07.2011 13:38, schrieb Thilo Götz:
On 14/07/11 18:48, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
On 7/14/11 4:20 PM, Peter Klügl wrote:
Hi all,
I got right now the OK of our legal department, after exactly 7 months...
don't ask ;-)
We would of course still like to contribute the system to Apache UIMA, if the
development team is interested.
It's maybe prudent to incrementally contribute the different parts of the
TextMarker system, e.g., starting with the rule engine after I reimplemented
it in August. Afterwards, if there is interest in the Eclipse IDE, then I'd
switch to DLTK 2.0 or 3.0 before contributing it.
I'm looking forward to your thoughts and opinions.
Why not contribute everything at once?
We have a sandbox where it can stay until it (or pieces of it) are in a
release-able state.
I believe it is actually a disadvantage when you decide to develop the eclipse
plugin outside
of Apache for a while, just to bring it into a state which you feel should be
contributed.
Because this way the knowledge about it also stays outside.
Jörn
A code contribution of that size is also a bit of work. You don't
want to go through it several times.
--Thilo
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Dipl.-Inf. Peter Klügl
Universität Würzburg Tel.: +49-(0)931-31-86741
Am Hubland Fax.: +49-(0)931-31-86732
97074 Würzburg mail: [email protected]
http://www.is.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de/en/staff/kluegl_peter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
