I'll take a look at the OSGi build. -Marshall
On 7/17/2011 12:16 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: > Since this is (I think) the first time we're releasing the OSGi packaging of > the > annotators, I think some work on their license/notice files might be needed, > because: > > - there are duplicate License files - one at the top level, and one in the > META_INF directory > - both of these are the plain vanilla license files. For projects which are > incorporating other libraries which are under other than the Apache v 2.0 > license, those licenses have to be included. > - the NOTICE file is present in the META_INF directory, but is the plain one, > rather than the project specific one. > > Finally, I wonder if the OSGi packaging strategy is correct - in that it > "bundles" every dependency into the OSGi file. This certainly makes the file > easier to use, but if a user uses 2 OSGi components from UIMA, won't there be > a > lot of unnecessary duplication (or does OSGi notice this and avoid it > somehow)? > I'm not sure of an alternative, but I do recall that OSGi allows for > dependencies on other packages; perhaps that could be useful? > > -Marshall > > On 7/15/2011 8:29 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: >> Hi all, >> I've prepared the new RC (4) for UIMA Addons release. >> >> The following is a list of issues addressed in this release: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310570&version=12316093 >> >> The source zip and binary files are available here: >> http://people.apache.org/~tommaso/uima-addons-2.3.1-rc4 >> >> SVN Tag Checkout: >> svn co >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/addons/tags/uima-addons-2.3.1-rc4/ >> >> Please cast your vote for UIMA Addons 2.3.1 release: >> >> [ ] +1 Approve the release >> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) >> [ ] 0 Don't care >> >> Regards, >> Tommaso >>
